WASCAL Academia Repository

Implication of Wind Speed Data variant for Wind Power Simulation

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Edoh, Adovi Fulbert Richcarlos
dc.date.accessioned 2026-02-10T14:25:24Z
dc.date.available 2026-02-10T14:25:24Z
dc.date.issued 2025-09-25
dc.identifier.uri http://197.159.135.214/jspui/handle/123456789/1023
dc.description A Thesis submitted to the West African Science Service Centre on Climate Change and Adapted Land Use, the Université Cheikh Anta Diop, Senegal, and the RWTH University of Aachen in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the International Master Program in Renewable Energy and Green Hydrogen (Economics/Policies/Infrastructures and Green Hydrogen Technology) en_US
dc.description.abstract With the need for a shift from the use of fossil fuels to renewable energy, wind technology is one of the promising, clean, renewable, and cost-effective energy sources. For sub-Saharan regions where 600 million people still lack electricity, wind energy appears to be an opportunity to assure energy security especially, in southern Africa, where abundant wind energy potential exists. Basically, wind technology consists of the use of a wind turbine, which extracts the kinetic energy of moving air through a rotor. This implies the knowledge of wind speed at the rotor level, known as Hub height (around 100m), but wind measurements are typically done at ground level (around 10m). Therefore, it is crucial to find alternative ways for wind data assessment at the rotor level. Numerical atmospheric datasets and height scaling methods seem to be solutions. This study evaluates the impact of using different height scaling methods with and without numerical atmospheric datasets, the high-resolution ICON in Limited Area Mode (ICON-LAM), the ERA5 reanalysis, and the statistical downscaling variant of ERA5 (ERA5_GWA) on the multiple heights wind speed calculation and subsequently, on the wind power estimation over southern Africa from 2017 to 2019. The results show that ERA5_GWA outperforms ERA5 and ICON-LAM for the 10m wind speed simulation. ERA5 introduced the highest bias with an underestimation of the wind power at 20m, 40m and 60m, regardless of the used wind speed height scaling method. Most of the scaling methods performed similarly except for the Justus_Law, which introduced an overestimation of the wind power, and the Linear interpolation, which introduced an underestimation. The accuracy of scaling methods using vertical levels of wind speed from numerical atmospheric datasets is highly dependent on the choices of the nearest levels close to the target height wind speed. This study reveals that the choice of datasets has a greater impact than wind speed height scaling on wind energy assessment. en_US
dc.description.sponsorship The Federal Ministry of Research, Technology and Space (BMFTR) en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher WASCAL en_US
dc.subject ICON-LAM en_US
dc.subject ERA5 en_US
dc.subject Global Wind Atlas en_US
dc.subject Wind Speed en_US
dc.subject Height Scaling en_US
dc.subject Wind Power en_US
dc.subject Africa. en_US
dc.title Implication of Wind Speed Data variant for Wind Power Simulation en_US
dc.type Thesis en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search WASCAL Academia


Browse

My Account